It’s been another great week of sharing thoughts and ideas from Ontario Edubloggers. There’s always something to engage and get my mind thinking and, for that, I’m so grateful. Here’s some of what I caught this past week.
We always talk about getting the perfect title for a blog post to hook potential readers. This one by Diana Maliszewski had me hook, line, and sinker. I tried to guess what sense it might be before visiting and I’ll confess to drawing a blank. It could be any of them.
“I smell you. I smell you Ms. Molly.” I’m pretty used to my personal space being invaded by little people, who touch, grab, and hug me constantly, but this scent examination unnerved me at first.
OK, from the first paragraph, I determine that maybe she didn’t bathe or something. Sorry, Diana.
She expanded on the concept and brought in so much that we now take for granted – perfume-free workspaces, for example – and then how to encourage the use of this scent in the classroom.
This approach totally took me by surprise but I’ll admit; I enjoyed the read and thinking.
Speaking of thinking, Jamie Reaburn Weir’s post challenges the notion of a number given to a student. Does the number define the student?
Any teacher worth their salt would answer the definition part with a resounding “NO”.
It brought back a memory of an absolutely genius young lady that I taught for three years in Computer Studies. She couldn’t do anything wrong, it seemed. I remember once giving her a 99 on some sort of assessment that was drop dead on target for what was required. Not only was she smart, she had just the nicest way of approaching things. She waited until the entire class had left and then asked me to show her what she missed so that it would never happen again.
I also remember a small handful of students in my education class who obviously had done the bare minimum for the assessments (and got the appropriate mark) and then went directly to the Dean about it. When the Dean and I reviewed their submissions, I was not only supported but got into a great philosophical discussion about assessment.
The conclusion is an interesting tack on to Jamie’s post – we don’t let the number define the student; the student allows the number to define themselves.
Either way, as Jamie notes, there are other ways of thinking about assessment and her students had ideas.
But, for now, we have these hurdles that society has accepted as proof of accomplishment.
I think real change has to go beyond just the school system; it has to be a change in societal attitudes about what defines success in education. That will be a much tougher nut to crack.
OK, maybe Sue Dunlop has the answer or at least can take our thinking along a different road.
I think we had the same parents…
So, with respect to students, what can be done to make them want to.
Then, in an unexpected turn, Sue talks about the other partners in education.
What can be done there?
After reading Anne Shillolo’s post, I can safely say I know much more about the history of watches than I ever thought that I would.
It took me on a tangent to read about Patek Philippe & Co. and the effect on the Apple Watch. How could a company created in 1851 impact a modern wearable device?
It’s all in the complications.
The website for Patek Phillippe watches states, “A ‘complication’ is any additional horological function to the display of hours, minutes and seconds.”
“Complicated watches made by Patek Phillippe are assigned to one of two categories.”
I’m just having visions of educators at the Bring IT, Together Conference next week comparing and contrasting complications.
Another smile to my face.
Sue Bruyns starts this post with reference to the cliche “Have a nice day”.
Years ago, there was a gentleman that worked in another part of the school who came to my desk and asked for a bit of advice or a favour or bite of my sandwich or something. I don’t recall. I just remember that we somehow interacted and, as he left, I said “Have a nice day”.
I still remember his response. He turned back and said “Why? Do you really care?”
I didn’t have the heart to say “No, not really and I have less inclination now to ever care…”
Years later, and I’m reading Sue’s blog post.
Now that I’m wiser, I realize that the statement is just a collection of words, non-committal, and just done because it was expected to be.
Maybe I should have said “Now that you’ve eaten my sandwich, or now that I’ve helped you, how are you planning to make the rest of the day special?” Or something. A question is really a prompt for further thinking and interaction. A statement indicates that we’re done and there’s no further interaction expected. If the goal is relationship building, maybe the focus should be on asking a question instead.
Sue may be on to something here.
Of all the computery things that you can do, is there nothing that’s more fun than working with a green screen? In this post, Colleen Rose talks about her experience setting things up in her classroom.
Plus, she’s bringing it to the Bring IT, Together conference next week. Is there any place that uses a green screen better than Niagara Falls? How many places can you purchase a picture of yourself going over the falls using the technique?
I have lots of fond memories of working the green screen myself. Once, at the professional learning lab at Dowswell, I wanted to play but had no green screen available until I realized that the data projector shining on a SMART Board provides a nice one. Plus, you can get some interesting 3D effects if you spend a lot of time at it. (or so I’ve heard)
I also recall an ECOO conference a few years ago when my friend Nazreen brought me on the stage as a stunt dummy for a Hall Davidson green screen demonstration. Sadly, I had worn my green/blue chequered shirt that day. We successfully answered the question “who don’t weather forecasters ever wear green?”
This could be a great deal of fun next week.
In an interesting followup to the field trip to the dump, Peter Cameron’s class had questions.
Of course, this could lead to some variability. What if Mr. Cameron owned an F-150 instead?
Thanks to all of the above for their wonderful posts. Lots of thinking on my part here and writing a response in a blog post makes it even better!
Please click through and enjoy their original thinking. There’s great stuff there and in all of the Ontario Edublogs. Check out some of the great writing and thinking and add yours to the list if it’s not there already.