Vaughan

First off …

ETFO

Today marks a day of rotating strike action by ETFO members in the following districts:

  • Kawartha Pine Ridge
  • Keewatin-Patricia
  • Lakehead
  • Near North
  • Ottawa Carleton
  • Ottawa Children’s Treatment Centre
  • Penetanguishene Protestant Separate School Board
  • Rainy River
  • Simcoe County
  • Upper Canada

Details here.


Over the weekend and continuing into this week, there has been a huge uproar about some newspaper advertising that appeared on the weekend in some of Ontario’s biggest newspapers.

Mysterious Group Uses ‘Made-Up Name’ and Fake Mom to Attack Teachers in Canada’s Biggest Newspapers

I didn’t see the advertising; I can’t recall the last time that I bought a paper newspaper, opting for the online editions. But reading the article reveals all of the details.

The discussion continues on Twitter…

Note the differences in spelling of the two searches. The Twitter account for the group is spelled @VaughnWorking.

We seem to be on a tear around this blog these days about media literacy. In this particular case, it’s about how anyone can purchase advertising and then include the type of information that it does. The problem is that nobody seems to be able to verify that the community group with this name exists. Does this mean that anyone can purchase advertising to get their message across?

This opinion piece from the Toronto Sun seems to think so.

People aren’t about to let the issue die. Trustee Norm Di Pasquale asked the Ad Standards Canada to step in. The update in the story indicates that they won’t because they don’t get into political matters.

My MPP, Taras Natyshak, is likewise demanding an investigation into this.

I agree with both Trustee Di Pasquale and MPP Natyshak that this incident needs to be looked into and resolved. It opens a huge door if we allow anyone to advertise their opinion publically provided they have enough money. The article featuring Natyshak indicates that the cost for the advertising could run as high as $100 000.

I hope that the advertising departments of the newspapers involved are sitting down to look at their practice as a result of this. Yes, advertising is a large source of revenue but is accepting the money without regard to content worth the reputation of the newspaper as a fair reporting source?

In the meantime, this sort of action continues to poison any chances that the public will honestly understand the issues and makes negotiations even more difficult.

Published by dougpete

The content of this blog is generated by whatever strikes my fancy at any given point. It might be computers, weather, political, or something else in nature. I experiment and comment a lot on things so don't take anything here too seriously; I might change my mind a day later but what you read is my thought and opinion at the time I wrote it! My personal website is at: http://www.dougpeterson.ca Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dougpete I'm bookmarking things at: http://www.diigo.com/user/dougpete

4 thoughts on “Vaughan

  1. I so appreciate your professionalism here, & how you’ve addressed this recent VWF news. When you put together your TWIOE post, I hope that you consider adding this one. A post worth others reading!

    Aviva

    Like

  2. I’ll be on the picket line today. UGH. Not where I’d like to be spending my day. This feels like a never ending fight. When is the next election again? 🙂

    Like

Comments are closed.