It was a little strange this week not doing the weekly radio show with Stephen Hurley to give an advance look at what would be in This Week in Ontario Edublogs. Unfortunately, we were not able to connect on a time on Wednesday so you get to see them all here first! Great stuff from Ontario Edubloggers.
Don’t forget – if you’re an Ontario Educational blogger or you know of one, go to the landing back at the link above and add the link to the blog. If you’re just looking to find new people to follow, I have the link to my Ontario Educator Twitter lists there as well.
Deborah McCallum is always good for providing a thought provoking post and this one doesn’t disappoint. It’s a really powerful reminder that teachers are there for the entire package and not to cherry pick topics.
With so much emphasis on improving mathematics test scores, it’s easy to overlook this.
I was thinking that maybe Peter Skillen had finally lost it. Hadn’t he already blogged about this before?
Well, maybe, probably, yeah, definitely, …
But it’s a topic well worth repeating.
We didn’t have ‘limited pedagogy’. We had a robust and vibrant movement and approach based on the work of Jean Piaget, Jerome Bruner, Seymour Papert, Frank Smith, Lev Vygotsky, Ivan Illich, Paulo Freire, A.S. Neill and countless others who promoted discovery learning, constructivism, student-centred approaches, open classrooms, active learning, multi-age learning groups, etc.
Check out Ontario’s Hall-Dennis Report (Living and Learning) of 1968.
The bizarre thing is that we didn’t have limited pedagogy in the past, in the past we had limited technology! I can remember when the Ministry of Education provided three Icon computers per school. Various sources were used to increase access to technology for students but the environment wasn’t perfect for a harmonious and easy use of technology in the classroom. When you have to “take the kids to the lab”, it could easily be assumed that it was a special event that had nothing to do with regular teaching and the excellent pedagogy that was understood.
But those excuses lie in a past limited by funding and access. We now have access and a marriage with good pedagogical practice should deliver on the promise.
Holy cow, it has generated a lot of discussion though.
If you’re a reader of Aviva Dunsiger’s work, you won’t be surprised about the wondering work. I think that her “wondering” makes for an improved environment for her students. We talk about inquiry and wonder being essential for students; why not for teachers?
This time, she’s wondering about people leaving her session early.
These are good questions to search for answers. There may well have been other circumstances. Perhaps it was just the fact that it’s summer and it was nice outside. Perhaps people could connect the dots and didn’t feel they needed the hands-on time.
There could be a million other reasons but I’m sure that Aviva’s wondering will result in a different approach in the future.
Perhaps do the “play” first and then tie the big concepts together afterwards? We live in a PD environment where people are encouraged to “learn with their feet” and to move on if their needs aren’t being met. That’s great in theory but how do you know where the session is ultimately headed?
Alanna King’s on holidays in Iceland with family. This is one in a series of posts about a summer exploration there.
There’s a great description of what’s happening to the family as they take a look here and there.
I’m just surprised that Tim didn’t rent a motorcycle and leave it to Alanna and Max to catch up later.
The best part is the beautiful pictures that she’s sharing.
I’m not going to say much except to highlight this last line from Jennifer Casa-Todd’s post.
How might you make someone’s world brighter today?
It’s not always easy.
On my recent trip to Baltimore, I spent a lot of time in airports (I live in fear of missing my flight) and so I’ll try to strike up a conversation with people. In one case, I offered my iPad to play a game on to a child who was a little wild.
Airport people like being left alone, I guess.
Attempting isn’t always appreciated but I hope that I never stop trying.
I taunted Paul McGuire to write a post so I guess that I should include it here.
So, what does an innovating leader look like?
I would hope that you say “like me”. I would also hope that you say “I lead by example” instead of “I lead by telling people what to do”.
I always see red flags when people use the term(s) “leader”, “innovator”, or “innovating leader” in their own bio or other places where they describe themselves. That is indeed the lowest of the low hanging fruit. Wind fall, perhaps. It’s more impressive when others use that term to describe them. Then, I sit up and notice.
The best piece of advice I ever received came from my father.
Be humble. You look good when you make others look better.
I’m always a sucker for a well-crafted blog post title and that’s what this was from Diana Maliszewski.
I started to read and got interested when she made reference to the Maker Festival in Toronto. Then, somehow the topic turned to a special trip to Toronto.
Pictures and stories about an anniversary are really few and far between so I did read to the end.
Congratulations, you two.
There’s always something to love from the blogs of Ontario Edubloggers. Please take the time to click through and read the entire posts and drop off a comment or two. They’ll really appreciate it.