This is the third post in a row written using Windows Live Writer. That means that I’ve been using Windows for three days in a row. That’s a modern day record! I notice that it’s Live Writer 2011. I wonder if there’s been an upgrade? I recall reading recently that it might go open source. That would be awesome.
Back on topic … here’s some great posting from Ontario Edubloggers from this past week.
On the Voice of Canadian Education blog, Stephen Hurley issued this challenge.
If you could write a letter to a first year teacher, what advice would you pass along.
He gives some perspective – what an administrator might say, what a student might say, what a teacher might say, what an outsider might say, …
I think it’s a great idea and I’m going to accept the challenge and write a blog post over the weekend sharing my thoughts.
Thanks for the inspiration, Stephen.
Fred Galang shares some of his thoughts about the Peel DSB’s social media guidelines.
Recently, the Peel District School Board released their social media guideline for staff and teachers. As much as I applaud their initiative (they’ll be the first to outline such guidelines for social media use in detail), there were a few items that sparked a healthy convo with my Tweeps over the last two days. Without the risk of repeating myself, I’ll simply address the most contentious for me.
In the beginning, teacher use of social media was really experimental. I can recall being involved with the OTF Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century series. In some quarters, there was a wish that there would be rules or guidelines. I remember having the discussion at the time and we agreed that you just couldn’t put it all into a one pager. The best advice we got still applies to day “Don’t do stupid things.”
I absolutely agree with Fred’s concerns. I never was a fan or rules. They always define a line between someone’s concept of what’s right and what’s wrong. If you’ve ever been in a classroom, you know that’s an immediate red flag for students to determine where that line actually is.
My sense is that the document still has the mentality that social media is a “think” that can be clearly defined and all the negatives drawn from it. The document does identify concerns, particularly about student privacy. Instead of a social media document that defines that, wouldn’t it make more sense to expand any existing privacy resource to include cautions?
I do wonder about the concept of having a person and a professional account. We’ve all seen people try to manage that and post from the wrong account. What would happen if students actually found out that you’re human and are a fan of the Detroit Tigers? Certainly the world wouldn’t end.
I still like the original advice “Don’t do stupid things.”
Royan Lee also wrote about the same thing and garnered some comments from Ontario Educators well worth the reading.
Not to belittle Royan’s other post, I really like what he did when he tackled the topic of BYOD/T again.
It’s to his credit that he’s identified in one of the comments as a “pioneer”. He’s certainly been very vocal and open about his experiences over the time that devices were welcomed in his class. He addressed these in detail in an interview that I had with him.
Royan’s just generally a great guy. I recall sitting next to him watching his kids swimming and we were just chatting. I still remember thinking “this guy is going to change the world, one class at a time”. He’s very vocal but not the sort of evangelist that exudes a “follow me or begone” approach.
In a world where some are debating the merits of BYOD, Royan speaks with the mature voice of experience.
If you’re collecting a list of definitive resources about BYOT, you need to include this post.
Dean Shareski did.
Facebook friends know that I had a major life event this past week. I was there with my phone taking pictures and sharing them on Facebook with friends. It’s fast and efficient and you get to see them all just as quickly as I can post them. Not all of them were absolute perfection but they were from my eyes.
My wife, on the other hand, goes a more traditional route. Even though she has a digital camera, it’s off to Shopper’s to get printed copies of them. She likes the more permanent record of them and the fact that she can put them in an album and leave them on a shelf.
Aviva Dunsiger reflected on the value of the printed photograph. I couldn’t help but think that this approach (and grudgingly my wife’s) will stand the test of time.
I think it’s testament to family history and the eye of the photographer that someone later on can use the word “incredible” to describe their efforts.
It makes you wonder about the legacy of images that those of us share online. I know that I do keep a copy on backup here but there still a trip into town away from being put in an album. There’s merit in that – one of my own favourite throwback pictures is of two buzzcut kids with their grandmother.
There probably is a preferable half-way meeting of the technologies to satisfy both worlds.
Check out Aviva’s entire post as she takes a look at both sides of the discussion. There’s some pretty wise insights and, as per Aviva’s normal, a bunch of questions to ask yourself.
Thanks everyone for continuing to write and inspire. Please take the time to enjoy the entire posts and all of the postings from Ontario Edubloggers. There’s always some great writing happening.
And, while writing this, I downloaded the latest Live Writer to see if I have the latest. I might have to hang around Windows for another day or so…