Step Away From The Store

I had a convergence of three things the other day.  What more do you need for a blog post?

First:  8 Excellent new iPad Apps for Teachers

Second:  Google launches Play Store for Education

Third was a conversation with a teacher who let me know that her school was an “iPad School” and she wasn’t happy.  I asked what that meant.  To her, it meant that all of the existing computers had been taken away and replaced by a mobile cart full of iPads.  It could be booked and rolled from class to class.

That was the good news.

Then the other shoe dropped.  The 16 iPads that were purchased were 16GB iPads that had come preconfigured with applications that were the choice of someone else.  The iPads were then locked down without the ability to install other applications, plus they came complete with applications to be used everywhere from Junior Kindergarten to Grade 8.  And, two of the applications were broken with updates available in the store but can’t be downloaded.

Then the tears started to flow – from her perspective, the implementation had taken away technology that had worked and replaced it with a technology that has the promise of being a game changer.  I did resist the urge to suggesting contacting a student from the Los Angeles Unified School District…

You’ve got to feel for well meaning educators.  They read these articles in November, three months into a school year, and then realize that they can’t do anything about it except to suggest that a new suite of applications be installed over the summer for the next school year.    It’s really not a problem with the technology – it’s as close to cutting edge as a school district can afford, has been shown to have great results for specific purposes, and most certainly can be used to capture a child’s imagination.

It’s just that this great software just came along.

Where a BYOD program is in place, it’s less of an issue.  Recommended applications can be added when Mom and Dad are alerted to the value, assuming that the application is available and actually runs on their chosen device.

When districts are clearly thinking through and seeing these limitations, alternative purchases are made.  That’s where you’re seeing the rise in popularity of the Chromebook.  In this case, users are not necessarily tethered to a store.  Log in to a unique account and the machine becomes the student’s as long as they’re logged in – unlike a device that was essentially a consumer device made to fit into education.

It’s tough for a developer.  Can an application actually be developed, tested, debugged, and made available to coincide with a school year calendar?  Certainly it has to be if you’re going to want people to use it.

Is there a better way for education?  I think that there are lessons to be learned from all of the current devices.  It’s nice to have the unique account ability of a Chromebook but it’s also nice to have the touch of an iPad or an Android tablet.

That’s where I think we need to step away from the store just a bit.  If you’re a regular reader of this blog, you know I’m a fan of Brian Aspinall and his projects.  (Disclosure – he was a student of mine at the Faculty of Education at the University of Windsor).  In his development, Brian tries  to get away from the traditional limitations of current devices and makes software for education that just works.  Any time, any place, any device.

If you need convincing, pull out all of your devices and try Sketchlot or Scrawlar.

I think that all educational developers could learn from this.  Rather than writing for, compiling, and distributing for different platforms with different design, why not write for them all?  It won’t complete get rid of the need for certain installed applications.

But it sure will give the teacher desiring the best for her classroom the moment she needs it, the opportunity.

 

About these ads

One thought on “Step Away From The Store”

  1. I know that I am pretty lucky in that my school has an IT person who is more than willing to roll out new applications to my computer lab during the year. That isn’t the case for everyone which is a shame.

    The advantage of web apps is the “no installation needed” piece for sure. That and being able to run on just about any device. These apps also have limitations (though fewer all the time) and so I really like being able to install “real” applications as well.

    Touch is a potential game changer. I don’t think that we have seen all the potential in touch for apps that create yet but for consumption we’ve come a long way. All of this is why I like the Microsoft Surface type of device. It seems to have the best of everything. But I’m biased of course.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s