Under the Ps

Saturday morning are meant for a little relaxing and fussing about cleaning or bike riding or messing with software for me.  Cleaning can wait; things are overcast so I’m waiting for a clearer indication of what the day might bring and so I’m down to messing with software, one of my favourite things to do anyway.

I continue to mess around with the new Flock browser.  I did add Chromed Bird as an extension to keep track of what’s happening in Twitter right in the browser but decided to take a deeper look at the support for Twitter that Flock offers.

Twitter itself has the list feature which can be a quick way to zero in on just who you would like to follow in a certain context.  So, I have my “Ontario Educators” list, my “Keynotes” list, and so on.  The list concept is fast and enabling.  One of the powerful aspect is that you can share lists and many have taken advantage of this by following “Ontario Educators” as their own list.  This is just another example of the power of collaboration.

Flock has a similar feature – they call it groups.  It seems to be based on the concept of creating these groups by filtering from your list of followers.  It’s a different approach to list creation where you can create a list of everyone without actually following them.

My friend Kelly introduced me to a term recently that I hadn’t heard for a long time.  It’s the term “Go-To Person”.  So, what the hey, I’m going to create myself a “Go-To Group” just to see how it works.  Then, I’ll put it to the test.

The first step is to expand the sidebar and choose the option to “Edit your groups…” and I’ll create one called “My Go-To Group”.  That was easy enough.

image

When you create a list on Twitter, it’s then a matter of going and finding those who you would like to add to the list.  With Flock, since you’re going to be filtering existing users, the process is a little cleaner and certainly a lot more visual and intuitive.

A window pops open with the friendly avatars and names of the folks that I’m currently following.  To add them to the group, it’s just a matter of identifying them and clicking on them.

image

This was a really quick process.  I was able to create this group in a matter of seconds.  The toughest part was to determine just who would be in my “Go-To Group”.  As I scroll through the list, I quickly realize how much that I value the wisdom of all of the folks that I follow.  I guess that only goes to make sense, doesn’t it?  That’s why we use Twitter!

But, I need a screen capture so I’m scrolling through and see a couple of important people under the Ps.  So, I’ll click on Go-To-@pbeens and Go-To-@peterskillen, two great go-to people in anyone’s books.  As you note above, they’re now selected and added to the group and I save them.

Back to the browser and I open the sidebar.  From the Group filter, it’s a quick pull down menu to filter to what these folks have been talking about recently.  Neat.

What remains to be seen is if I can share this group across computers and then to a wider audience.  Hopefully, that becomes apparent as the browser continues to evolve.  I wonder how it would work if you share the group with another person who doesn’t follow someone who you are and have added to the group.

Time will tell but the skies are clearing and I’m off for a bike ride.

links for 2010-06-18

By dougpete Posted in Uncategorized

Learning Environments – Personalized

I listened to an Intellum podcast yesterday instead of my usual musical settings in my office over lunch.  The interview was with Stephen Downes, a Senior Researcher for the National Research Council.  That probably shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.  I read Stephen’s thoughts on a daily basis through OLDaily and so when this podcast became available, it was worth a listen.

I enjoy his thinking, particularly on open education and so expected to listen to your typical podcast of 10-15 minutes sort of skimming over the issue being discussed.  This was a real treat as it was over an hour long (so long I had to listen to it in pieces) and it covered a myriad of topics.  But, there was one topic that tied a lot of loose ends together for me.  The topic was loosely focused around Personal Learning Environments but took off in tangents on thoughts all related in some way to the original premise.

There was one concept that really resonated with me.  The discussion headed off to the challenge of logging into the various services on the web.  If there are a million services available, there are probably a million different ways to register and log in to get the benefits of the service.  It only makes sense – you want your privacy respected and you want your the integrity of any product or service that you use protected as well.

Each time that you register and sign into a service, you should be concerned about this and evaluate just how much personally identifiable information you’re providing the service.  It doesn’t happen often but we all have heard of security lapses and the exposure of information onto the wide web.

There are ways to get around this, of course.  There is OAuth login and OpenID that attempt to let you control your identity by asking before you grant access to your information and, of course, Google, Facebook, etc. all want to play in this area as well.  It’s a good concept; not perfect, but it allows for the web equivalent of a single signon that many organizations strive to have for all of their services.  Part of the problem is that there is no single source and the concept isn’t universally accepted.

In addition, you need to weigh the trust of the resource that you’re going to use.  If you accept the risks, you log in and are essentially working in their environment.  If it’s a text editing service you’re using, for example, you’re subject to their level of programming expertise and the foibles of their software.  Like they say, if everything was perfect, everything would be version 1.0.

Into all this, we look at all of the angles.  One of today’s realities, in addition to the login concerns, is knowing just what you’re logging into.  The word phish wasn’t invented when I was a kid except in the concept of “We went phishing at the phalls.”  How do you ensure that what you’re logging into is legitimate?  Yahoo! addresses this by allowing you to create your own personal seal so that you recognize the service as unique to you.  It’s pretty difficult to phish when every user has a different experience when they visit your site to login.

image

Yet, when you log into Yahoo!, you have their set of tools which are different from any of the other services so another learning curve.  Just how much time is spent learning new and diverse online environments?  Is this time well spent, or should we be devoting the time and energy to getting to it.  We know the answer to that.  But, it doesn’t exist at present.

That’s why the concept of the Personal Learning Environment is intriguing.  If I’m working online, why should there be a different way of doing things at the GECDSB from the WECDSB from the University of Windsor from St. Clair College?  What would change if all of these resources reside on your personal computer and you use them to interact with whatever it is that you want to do online?  No more goofy stand on your head protocols just to get the job done.  My observation is that the more that you spread your online time widely, the less time that you spend getting deeply into any one of them.  Imagine an environment where you’re truly the master of everything you need and you use these tools to expedite the learning.

It goes deeper than that.  Recently, I was reading a discussion about student use of an assistive technology program.  Every year, computers are freshly imaged by IT Departments over the summer to ensure that the latest software and patches are applied for the new school year.  Storage is at a premium and so, unless you really think it through, an assistive technology program that “learns” your actions or your voice or your other exceptionality starts anew and the student needs to re-train it every fall.  But, in a Personal Learning Environment, all of this stays with the user and the student just gets on with it. 

One of the hot topics of the day is Differentiated Instruction and so much effort goes into the pedagogy behind that.  Imagine a world where we pay more than lip service to it with technology and we truly develop a customized and familiar environment that follows the user from application to application.

There’s a great deal to think about with this concept.  I would encourage you to put aside a couple of hours to this.  Listen to the podcast intently and just note the ideas and concepts they’re presented and how they might apply to you.  After listening, take some time to think about the possibilities that this approach affords.  What can you do about it?  Can we support efforts that are trying to make this happen?  Or do we bring out a notepad to keep track of logins and passwords and what little gotchas are needed to get the most from yet another online resource?

links for 2010-06-17

By dougpete Posted in Uncategorized

Extending Flock

Yesterday evening was filled with a couple of time consuming activities.  One was a long online meeting and the other was to play around with the newly installed Beta version of Flock.

As I indicated yesterday, Flock is based upon the code from the Chromium Project and so if you know Chromium or Google Chrome, you know Flock.  There are enhancements built into the code for the online world should you wish to use them.

But, like Chromium and Google Chrome, there is support for Extensions to give extended functionality to your browser.  Extensions are a fascinating world.  You can tweak your browser for maximum functionality or you can bring it to its knees with everything that you install.

For me, the ultimate goal is to have virtually everything that I do enabled for me in my browser.  But, how to achieve this intelligently has always been a challenge.  When I head to an Add-in or Extension gallery, I feel like I’m walking into one of those mega-electronic stores.  When the teenager steps up and says “Dude, can I help you?”, I look around at all the imagery and gadgets and want to say “I’ll take one of everything to go.”  Now, I know that I want one of every Extension but where is that fine line between necessity and whim?

The first thing I have to have is Shareaholic.  It’s the basis of so much of what I do with web services and so it’s nice to have that comforting green icon smiling at me.  What’s next?

Maybe at major get togethers, like ECOO, RCAC Symposium, or ISTE, we should just have a birds of feather session to discussion what extensions or add-ins are worth the effort?  Other than that, it’s try and die or try and win.

Fortunately, the folks at Flock are sharing their recommendations once you download the program.  There’s some comfort knowing that they’ve made these recommendations so there’s a reasonable assurance that they’ll work.

 

image

Evernote is great.  Cooliris spectacular.  Word This.  Hmmm.  I wonder if this is the recommended replacement for the blogging facility dropped from the older Flock.  I grab that and start to blog.  A word of caution – if you’re using this, make sure that you are saving as you go.  Just sayin’

I didn’t need Blog This! but the Slideshow is neat.  In terms of my Google Mail checker, I really the Google Mail Checker Plus Extension instead of the recommended one above as it allows for simple mail checking right from the toolbar. 

Thanks to my buddies @thecleversheep and @pbeens, I add Readability Redux.  I went to get the Web of Trust Extension and came away with Ultimate Chrome Flag instead.  And of course, you have to have the Google Reader Notifier.  Oh, and Chromed Bird.

So, nicely dressed up, I’m taking on the world with the new browser.  It’s looking pretty good.  Is anyone else giving the new Flock a shakedown?  What are your experiences?

links for 2010-06-16

By dougpete Posted in Uncategorized

Flock 3.0

A year ago, Flock 2.# was my main browser.  It was built on the Mozilla engine (the same one that drives Firefox) but it’s claim to fame was the integration of social media right into the browser.  You could follow Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, and even write your own blog using its built-in editor.

It was great.  The other alternative was to use Firefox and then add all kinds of add-ons to get the functionality that you seek.

Then, Flock seemed to stall.  While Firefox continued to grow, there were fewer and fewer updates to Flock itself.  the browser seemed to languish.  While this was happening, the browser seemed to feel old.  On both the Macintosh and Windows platforms, it wasn’t uncommon for the browser to really heat up the machine and the cooling fans got a good workout.  At the same time, it seemed sluggish, even when I would run it without extension in place.  It got so bad that I dropped it as my main browser and kept taking a peek to see if there was an upgrade.  It really was a great browser in the beginning.

I would read everything that I could and there were rumblings that the browser was being re-written using the Chromium source.  But, that was about it.

This morning, I read that Flock 3.0 was out in Beta form.  So, in memory of the good times with earlier versions, I went and downloaded the program.  It truly is a 3.0, notes indicate that you are looking at Beta software, and it’s built on Chromium!

That would finally end the rumours and also explain while Flock was missing in action for so long.  So, a quick download and within minutes I’m using the new browser.

True to the Chromium philosophy, it has a very minimalist approach to screen design.  But that’s OK.  Let’s dig around and take a look.

image

Upon launch, you’re asked to create a Flock account.  The fine print does have some interesting details about privacy and so I think I’ll pass at this time.  After all, it is Beta so we’ll wait and see.  The familiar social menu is there, on the right this time.  There is room for

Tabbed browsing is there true to Chromium.  It’s what you would expect.

Support for Chromium extensions are there as well.  I was very surprised to note that the blog editor was not in this beta release.  That was something that I used all the time.  I wonder if it’s on the development roadmap for the future.  In the meantime, there are extensions there for Google Chrome that will do the trick.

The browser seems to run smoothly but I wonder about its future.  The old Flock was built on the Mozilla source.  It looked like and felt like a new browser.  My first impression is that it looks like, acts like, and mostly feels like Chrome.  So, what’s the reason to make the switch permanent?

Time will tell as the browser matures.  In the meantime, welcome back, Flock.  If interested, you can get the Beta release at:  http://beta.flock.com

links for 2010-06-15

By dougpete Posted in Uncategorized