links for 2010-04-14

Tell a Story

A new feature of Google adds considerable excitement to the whole search process with huge overtones for the classroom.  Huge.

One of my favourite albeit condescending application in this realm is “Let Me Google That For You“.  It’s a great answer when you get the question – do you know about …?  from someone who is too lazy to use a search engine for their own purposes.

From Google comes  a new feature.  If you saw the advertisement during the SuperBowl, then you’ve already got a flavour for it.

Head over to Google Search Stories to begin.  In the example below, I used the custom template to create some Google search terms for where you might expect to see any content that I’ve ever created and posted to the internet.  Then, it’s just a matter of picking the appropriate music and let the application do its thing.  The result is a movie that you can post to YouTube.

That was amazingly easy to do.  Now, where could you possibly use it in education?

Portfolio
Suppose you are indeed a great creator of content.  Why not use this facility to quickly create a movie to show others where you are and how to get there?  It adds a whole new dimension to the concept of being “Google-able”, doesn’t it?  If you’re not giving back, you’re  - well – hard to Google.

Research Bibliography
I really like this concept.  If  the current project involves elements of student research to find digital artifacts as part of their studies, use this utility to demonstrate to the teacher exactly what search terms that they used to feed their research.  If the students are indeed pulling down articles from various internet resources for their works, why not embed this at the end of the report on the class wiki.  Since the length of the movie created is dependent upon the number of searches created, perhaps a nice side effect is a richer depth of research as they try to find the best resources.

School Website Enhancement
Related to the concept of a personal portfolio, how about a video about your school or organization?  If you’re active and have a dynamic presence in the community, creating content, or want to show off teacher wikis and blog, why not search for them and put together a nice montage suitable for embedding?

It’s a fun web application, to be sure.  But, I think used properly, there could be terrific enhancements to the research and reporting process.

How could you see it working?

Social Bookmarks:

links for 2010-04-13

Mark Up That Globe

You need Java to see Globe Applet.

If that isn’t cool enough, the project allows you to stick little pins into your globe. These pins are identifed by their latitude and longitude. In its simplicity, we just identify places.

But…

Each of the little pins could also be tied to a URL.  In the second example on this page, I’ve painstakingly visited each of the Canadian Capital cities with a GPS unit to find its location and tied it to the city’s main webpage. (Or used Google Earth to come to a close value) Choose your version of my story!

Double click on the base of each pin to visit the capital cities of the provinces and territories.

You need Java to see Globe Applet.

What a way to make Geography or History come alive.
Use research to identify student origins or explorer’s travels or current events or…

Or, you could just zoom in on Antarctica and see it in whatever context you wish for the first time.

Geosphere is downloadable from http://sourceforge.net/projects/hm-geosphere and instructions for installation and creation of the file for your stick pins are included in the documentation.

Download it and give it a shot. If you’re interested in the file with the latitude and longitude for the Canadian Capital cities, you can download it from here.

links for 2010-04-12

A Challenging Weekend

We Petersons are an incredibly competitive group.  I attribute it to my parents.  After all, we used to have to play Bridge after church on Sundays, I think we owned every board game ever invented, and Peterson Christmas with my aunts and uncles was just one big rotating circus of Euchre games.  It’s amazing that I married who I did.  Her family counts with fives.  Good Grief!

It was my kids that convinced me that I should invest time in a Facebook account.  Daaaaaad, we can play Scrabble and Word Twist.  There goes time every day being humbled repeatedly by my daughters.

So, it comes as no surprise when the oldest one – let’s call her The Weasel sent me a message a couple of weeks ago.  Dad, do you have this app called Word with Friends?  We could play a word game on our iPods without even going on the computer.  Her iPod has become her constant companion and it sure gets a workout.

This weekend, it got a really intensive workout with two applications.  First, there was Words with Friends.  To her mother’s chagrin, we would even challenge each other from one end of the couch to another.  The game was so hot and heavy and active, that I knew that I could grab an overlay of an announcement that it was my turn as I was composing a Twitter message to that effect.

Wease

It was great fun, back and forth, and I seem to be the master of this game — for now.  The Weaze also likes the feature of taking on random competitors from the Internet to improve her game.  Myself, I noticed a tweet from @elemenous inviting people to challenge her, so I had a game with her as well.  I can’t speak highly enough of this application for engagement.  The advertising in the free version is a little “in your face”, but it’s a great app.

Our weekend got even more competitive.  I read a Twitter message from @CanadaCool.  I checked out the statement and was impressed and retweeted it.  After all, good success and innovation needs to be promoted.

image

Then, I downloaded this app.  My first impression – yeah, it was created by an 18-year-old.  The crude graphics looked that way.  But, an hour of poking around later made me realize that it wasn’t about the graphics.  This was a real noodle scratcher.

iPhone Image E870B1

It just kept getting more and more difficult and more and more fun.  Games like this are a real challenge to me.  After all, how could an iPod outsmart me.  Grrrrrr.

Then, I showed The Weasel the application and she was off to the races.  Now, we’re again in the same room furiously tap, tap, tapping our way through the puzzles.  When my wife joined us, we got the obligatory “nerds” comment but we were busy trying to one up each other.  Eventually, we both did go our separate ways.  However, the telephone was put to use to convey strategies and ideas for some of the more challenging levels.

Whew!  It’s almost relaxing to go to work and get behind the content filter which takes all the fun out of using these things.

I would encourage you to check out both applications – but make sure that you have disposable time to enjoy them.

Words with Friends – Challenge me if you do download this.

The Impossible Test – Don’t read the spoilers until you’ve worked with the app for a while.

Social Bookmarks:

links for 2010-04-11

Self Correcting

Wikipedia takes so much abuse from “real researchers”.  This is based on a number of things but one is that “not all the facts are true and verifiable” and “anyone can add or edit anything”.  If you take this to its logical conclusion, you’ll get the impression that it’s a place bereft of value and to be avoided at all costs.
Those who argue in favour of its value point to the fact that Wikipedia is quick to respond to new information; yes there may be incorrect facts but look at the big encyclopedias; and the community will correct inaccuracies.
I awoke this morning to read a Twitter message from one of the folks that I follow, PragueBob, who provides interesting and insightful commentary from Europe.

My immediate thought was “Isn’t that the airplane that Lech Kaczyński was on?”  So, to verify, I did an internet search and the Wikipedia was the first entry and there was an entry about this particular aircraft and its history.

The accounting is a very in-depth reporting on this model and its 40 year history.  Like most aircraft, there were various revisions to the aircraft and it had been deployed in many different situations ans scenarios other than just a commercial transport carrier.

In addition to the facts about the past history of the aircraft, there was also an entry about the accident that happened this weekend.  Now, this speaks so loudly to the fact that a community edited encyclopedia is fast and responsive to current events.  But, formal investigations have just begun.  Events like this can take a long time to get to all of the details.  Part of the text from the article appears below in italics.

In January 2010, Russian national carrier Aeroflot announced the retirement of its Tu-154 fleet after almost 40 years of service (pre-production deliveries began in 1970), with the last flight operated by Aeroflot Flight 736 from Ekaterinburg to Moscow on 31 December 2009.[citation needed] As of April 2010, 28 of the type have been involved in fatal accidents, including one involving the President of Poland. According to the BBC and aviation expert Paul Duffy the Tu-154 has an average safety record for its type and length of service especially considering its heavy use in the most demanding conditions often with poor air traffic control; of the 28 aircraft lost to accident few appear to have been due to technical failure.[citation needed] 10th of April 2010 the same Tupolev has been crashed near Smolensk’s airport killing all of 96 passangers including President of Poland Lech Kaczynski, his wife and top polish government.

If you look closely, this entry is indeed topical and very responsive to this unfortunate incident.  But, and it’s a big but and so worthy of note, the Wikipedia community is not going to let this entry go unchallenged and unverified.  There are demands for appropriate citations.  These statements are not going to be accepted as truth without proper research.  The community will respond and this will be a living, breathing entry that will provide the appropriate level of detail.

I won’t name names but I did a similar search on another encyclopedia that one would normally associate as a credible source and got … nothing.  It its defence, I’m sure that there are a team working on this and there will eventually be a report suitable for inclusion.

The difference between these two sources, it seems to me, is the ability to respond quickly with accurate facts.

Which source would you use?  Which source would your students use?  What would Google do?  How do you balance accuracy with immediacy?  How responsive to current events does an encyclopedia need to be?

Tupolev Tu-154. (2010, April 11). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 10:02, April 11, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tupolev_Tu-154&oldid=355301518

Social Bookmarks:

links for 2010-04-10

It’s just an add-in or is it?

I’ve expressed my thoughts and hopes for the future and HTML5 before.  Like many people, I get frustrated with the flurry of requests for updates to Flash that seemed to come quite frequently a while back.  To be fair, I haven’t been nagged to update for a little while so I’m hoping that the security issues, etc., have been resolved.  Performance has always been a concern (my MacBook Pro fires up the cooling fans for intense Flash experiences) but I can reconcile it knowing that the resulting interactive experience will be worth it.  I think that ultimately HTML5 will win out unless Adobe does something big and develops a new interactive paradigm that keeps Flash as a viable alternative.

That’s all in the future though.  At present, there are options like YouTube that let you flip into HTML5 for your browsing experience but you’re warned going in that it’s still beta and you are limited to a certain set of browsers in order to run it.  The interactive experience is still largely supported by Flash.  Of that, there is no doubt.

Unless you’re using an Apple portable device, of course.

The iPod and its family do not support Flash.  I’ve bemoaned that for a while but it’s the reality if you’re using that platform.  This article from Cnet provides some insight into the thinking that has gone into the deliberate design not to allow Flash support.  Yesterday, hot and heavy, was reference to a blog post from an Adobe evangelist from the other side of the situation.  From my perspective, it’s pretty sad to see two industry leaders duking it out so publically.

I really enjoy the portability of my iPod and the ability to pull it from my pocket and use it so seamlessly in my daily life.  From an end user perspective, though, it is frustrating to see the “little blue box” indicating that there’s a missing add-in element.  Throughout my own web publishing, I do have Flash elements like this from our Student Reference Portal.  It’s not a terribly big issue; I had written some of this a few years back when I was learning Actionscript and it was handy to include that element in any page that I wanted.  Fortunately, few of the public pages are totally written in Flash and so I’ll have to plug away at compatibility over the next while.  I had put off doing this awaiting the release of the iPad and insights to OS4 for the iPod but Flash support doesn’t appear forthcoming.

iPhone Image E5CADA

Overall, I’m really disappointed that the support for Flash isn’t there and not indeed not forthcoming.  Without it, the complete web experience isn’t there.  It’s frustratingly not there for education.  I keep hearing that the iPad is a game changer.  It begs the question “what game?”  At $499US, I get a limited access to the game.  For fewer dollars, I can go to a legitimate computer and get it all.  With these other devices, I have to pick and choose.

For example, check out Stonehenge or the Sistine Chapel or this great Prezi “Math is not linear” or the “Interactive Period Table of the Elements” or any other interactive learning environment.  Right now, you’re relegated to developing a “Plan B” if you had planned to incorporate this into a lesson.

I’m certainly further removed from the situation than Lee Brimelow.  But, I’m close enough to try and weigh my needs.  No doubt, there are issues on all sides of this discussion.  In a few years, it may be that this has all been resolved and we’re all happy again.  Right now, you’re forced to make the decision about whether Flash capabilities are just an add-in that can be worked around or whether it completes the web experience for you and you have to have it.  As of the news this morning, 450,000 folks have decided the former.

Social Bookmarks: