<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A First Look at Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/a-first-look-at-google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/a-first-look-at-google-chrome/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kingdom media</title>
		<link>http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/a-first-look-at-google-chrome/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>kingdom media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/a-first-look-at-google-chrome/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE... if it&#039;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#039;t IE, then i&#039;ll use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE&#8230; if it&#8217;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#8217;t IE, then i&#8217;ll use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
